#LIFTW https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64a60e352cd4064e070e20e5

Poor little petulant child at https://libertyisftw.org/2020/11/10/54511/ and all the the other haters of TheDon cannot wrap around his grasshopper brain that Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Lin Wood have the goods. Do your homework, little grasshopper. Their cases are public with the evidence. And Peter Navarro has compiled evidence. What are you afraid of? Is your reptilian brain ruling you critical thinking skills? Military law exists to protect the US Constitution from enemies, foreign and domestic enemies like you. The military is loyal to the US Constitution, unlike a demon like you. It is like a fail safe system. Military intelligence has every MAC address and IP address from China and Iran, Germany, Italy. For example, an Italian contractor employee of a defense contractor has come forward and filed a deposition. https://intelreform.org/deposition-in-italian-federal-court-leonardo-employee-details-election-interference/

A blog of Conservative Principles

It is not over, little grasshopper. Arizona is going to fall. The forensic audit is moving forward and not looking good for your communist democrats. Pennsylvania and Georgia will be next. These states violated their own election laws to allow the mail in ballots. The states already have absentee ballot system. Why mail in ballots that cannot be verified? I am involved in local politics and I know these laws. Some states refuse to clean the voter rolls. Why? People die and relocate in/out of a state everyday. If the election was free of fraud as you and your ilk claim, then why push back on a forensic audit? Where is your confidence? This proves you are a demonic fraud. You have nothing on Trump. Everything your demons have thrown at Trump has come back null and void. Russia, Russia, Russia Mueller investigation failed to produce evidence. They interviewed over 500 people and NOTHING. Two impeachments failed. So what fraud are you and your demons going to throw at Trump now? You have no credibility.

America’s Idiot Problem Is Just Beginning

The little grasshopper at #LIFTW is propagating lies. Sicknick did not die from from traumatic brain injuries caused by a Trump supporter hitting him in the head with a fire extinguisher. His mother disputed this. He died of natural causes and suffered a stroke.

Ashli Babbitt was murdered by a plainclothes officer of Capitol Police. You have no right to kill for what she did. She was not brandishing a weapon. Her parents will sue. Why has not the killer identity been made public? What are you hiding from, grasshopper? Trump was still giving his speech on the Eclipse when the Capitol was stormed by BLM/Antifia thugs, not Trump supporters. The Capitol Police were compromised and allow the rioters in the building. There is video to prove. Do you homework, little grasshopper.

Trump supporters had NOTHING to do with the deaths of Kevin Greeson, Benjamin Phillips, Officer Howard Liebengood and Christopher S. Georgia. More MSNBC/CNN logic you swallow up with your reptilian brain. And, there is not such thing as Qanon. There is Q and there are Anons. At least get it right, whether you follow Q or not.

The arrogant, petulant child little grasshopper at #LIFTW wears his education on his sleeve, yet cannot grasp the science. His hatred for Trump and supporters is blinding him from rational thought. Criminal Fauci is not the final authority on this. There are many other medical professionals that disagree with Fauci. So, why the censorship of those that disagree? Try this little grasshopper: (1) Eat a big bowl of beans (2) Wait for a big fart to come (3) Put on the mask you bought from the Dollar Store that has no medical studies to back up your false medical claims. (4) Smell your fart! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

From the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.

COVID-19 is as politically-charged as it is infectious. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO, the CDC and NIH’s Dr. Anthony Fauci discouraged wearing masks as not useful for non-health care workers. Now they recommend wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are hard to do (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies). The recommendation was published without a single scientific paper or other information provided to support that cloth masks actually provide any respiratory protection. Let’s look at the data.

The theory behind mask wearing:

• Source control: Cloth mask can trap droplets that come out of a person’s mouth when they cough or sneeze.
• Protection: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) – only N95 masks

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Note: A COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) particle is 0.125 micrometers/microns (μm); influenza virus size is 0.08 – 0.12 μm; a human hair is about 150 μm.

*1 nm = 0.001 micron; 1000 nm = 1 micron; Micrometer (μm) is the preferred name for micron

*1 meter is = 1,000,000,000 [trillion] nm or 1,000,000 [million] microns

*For a complete dissection and explanation of aerosols and airborne particles, please see Understanding Particle Size and Aerosol-based Transmission by Steve Probst. https://www.4cconference.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Understanding-Particle-Size-and-Aerosol-Based-Transmission.pdf

Droplets

• Virus is transmitted through respiratory droplets produced when an infected person coughs, sneezes, or talks.
  • Larger respiratory droplets (>5 μm) remain in the air for only a short time and travel only short distances, generally <1 meter. They fall to the ground quickly.https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext
  • This idea guides the CDC’s advice to maintain at least a 6-foot distance.
• Small (<5 μm) aerosolized droplets can remain in the air for at least 3 hours and travel long distances (up to 27 ft.).
  • https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMc2004973?articleTools=true;
  • https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/podcasts-webinars/special-ep-masks;
  • https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25769/rapid-expert-consultation-on-the-possibility-of-bioaerosol-spread-of-sars-cov-2-for-the-covid-19-pandemic-april-1-2020

Air currents

• In an air conditioned environment these large droplets may travel farther.
• Ventilation.  Even the opening of an entrance door and a small window can dilute the number of small droplets to one half after 30 seconds. (This study looked at droplets from uninfected persons). This is clinically relevant because poorly ventilated and populated spaces, like public transport and nursing homes, have high SARS-CoV-2 disease transmission despite physical distancing.
  • https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30245-9/fulltext

Humidity

• Since 1961, experiments showed that viral-pathogen-carrying droplets were inactivated within shorter and shorter times as ambient humidity was increased. Dryness drives the small aerosol particles. See e.g., review of studies, https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-20-06-covid-0302

Conclusions

The preponderance of scientific evidence supports that aerosols play a critical role in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.  Years of dose response studies indicate that if anything gets through, you will become infected.

• Thus, any respiratory protection respirator or mask must provide a high level of filtration and fit to be highly effective in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.  (Works for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (3μm)
• Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes).
• The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.

MASKS

Filter Efficiency and Fit

Data from a University of Illinois at Chicago review https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data

• HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filters are 99.97 to 100% efficient. HEPA filters are tested with particles that are 0.125 μm (the size of SARS-CoV-2).
• Masks and respirators work by collecting particles through several physical mechanisms, including diffusion (small particles) and interception and impaction (large particles).
• Surgical masks are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids. They aren’t effective at blocking particles smaller than 100 μm. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/957730O/respirators-and-surgical-masks-contrast-technical-bulletin.pdf
  • OSHA/CDC:  A surgical mask is not a respirator. It cannot be used to protect workers who perform or assist with aerosol-generating procedures, which may create very fine aerosol sprays. A surgical mask can only be used to protect workers from contact with the large droplets made by patients when they cough, sneeze, talk or breathe. https://www.osha.gov/dts/guidance/flu/healthcare.html

Laboratory Studies

• N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are constructed from electret (a dielectric material that has a quasi-permanent electric charge.) An electret generates internal and external electric fields so the filter material has electrostatic attraction for additional collection of all particle sizes. As flow increases, particles will be collected less efficiently.
• A properly fitted N95 will block 95% of tiny air particles down to
  0.3 μm from reaching the wearer’s face.
  • https://www.honeywell.com/en-us/newsroom/news/2020/03/n95-masks-explained.
  • Problem: no source control. An N95 does not filter exhaled air passing through the exhaust/exhalation valve (for easier breathing and less moisture inside the mask).
• Study measuring filter efficiency (2010)
  • https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744; https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data; https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
  • Filter efficiency was measured across a wide range of small particle sizes (0.02 to 1 µm) at 33 and 99 L/min.
  • All the cloth masks and materials had near zero efficiency at 0.3 µm, a particle size that easily penetrates into the lung (SARS-CoV-2 is 0.125 µm)
  • Efficiency for the entire range of particles
    • T-shirts — 10%
    • Scarves — 10% to 20%
    • Cloth masks — 10% to 30%
    • Sweatshirts — 20% to 40%
    • Towels — 40%

• Study measuring filter efficiency (2014, Korea)
  • https://aaqr.org/articles/aaqr-13-06-oa-0201
  • Evaluated 44 masks, respirators, and other materials with similar methods and small aerosols (0.08 and 0.22 µm)
    • N95 FFR filter — >95% efficiency
    • Medical masks — 55% efficiency
    • General (cloth) masks — 38% efficiency
    • Handkerchiefs — 2% (one layer) to 13% (four layers) efficiency.
• Conclusion: Wearing masks (other than N95) will not be effective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as PPE.
  • N95s protect health care workers, but are not recommended for source control transmission.
  • Surgical masks are better than cloth but not very efficient at preventing emissions from infected patients. Cloth masks must be 3 layers, plus adding static electricity by rubbing with rubber glove.
  • The cloth that serves as the filtration for the mask is meant to trap particles being breathed in and out. But it also serves as a barrier to air movement because it forces the air to take the path of least resistance, resulting in the aerosols going in and out at the sides of the mask.
  • An August 2020 UCSF study suggested that the mask would decrease the absolute volume of the inoculum. (The concentrations of bacteria upstream and downstream of the test devices were measured with an aerodynamic size spectrometer) https://ucsf.app.box.com/s/blvolkp5z0mydzd82rjks4wyleagt036

---

Human Studies

• Study of correct use of masks (2020, Singapore).
  • https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/publichealth/86601
  • Overall, data were collected from 714 men and women. Of all ages, only 90 participants (12.6%) passed the visual mask fit test. About 75% performed strap placement incorrectly, 61% left a “visible gap between the mask and skin,” and about 60% didn’t tighten the nose-clip.
• Study of surgical face mask use in health care workers (2009, Japan).
  • https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216002/  
  • Masks did not provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting cold.
• Randomized clinical trial of standard medical/surgical masks in health care workers (2010, Australia).
  • https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00198.x?fbclid=IwAR3kRYVYDKb0aR-su9_me9_vY6a8KVR4HZ17J2A_80f_fXUABRQdhQlc8Wo.
  • Study was spurred by the H1N1 flu. While N95 masks offered protection against respiratory illness, medical mask wearers and control group numbers were similar.
• Review of influenza virus and face masks in health care workers (HCWs) (2010, Hong Kong).
  • https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
  • 6 studies of face mask use, both surgical masks and N-95 respirators in HCWs and community settings. The effectiveness of face masks is probably impacted by compliance issues in both the healthcare and community setting. Various studies show a lower level of compliance with face masks or find lower reported acceptability of face masks compared to hand hygiene behaviors and other non-pharmaceutical interventions.
• Review of masks against influenza (2012, Europe).
  • https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
  • 17 eligible studies.  One study had improvement with mask plus hand sanitizer.  None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask ⁄ respirator use and protection against influenza infection.
• *The first randomized controlled trial of cloth masks in health care workers (2015, Australia).
  • https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/pdf/bmjopen-2014-006577.pdf
  • Penetration of:
    • Cloth masks by particles — 97%
    • Medical masks — 44%,
    • 3M Vflex 9105 N95 — 0.1%
    • 3M 9320 N95 —  <0.01%
  • Cloth masks resulted in significantly higher rates of infection than medical masks, and also performed worse than the control arm some of whom may have worn masks.
  • The virus may survive on the surface of the face masks
  • Self-contamination through repeated use and improper doffing is possible. A contaminated cloth mask may transfer pathogen from the mask to the bare hands of the wearer.
  • Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks, and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.
  • Cloth masks should not be recommended for health care workers, particularly in high-risk situations.
• Review of N95 and surgical masks against respiratory infection (2016). https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/188/8/567.full.pdf
  • From January 1990 to December 2014.  6 clinical studies:  3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 cohort study and 2 case–control studies, and 23 surrogate exposure studies.
  • In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, “no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”
• Review of masks and N95s against respiratory infection (2017, Singapore).
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix681
  • Separate meta-analyses of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 23 observational studies conducted during the 2003 SARS pandemic.
  • Compared to medical masks, N95 respirators provided greater protection against clinical respiratory illness (CRI) and bacterial respiratory illness (BRI). These 2 outcomes were common in these trials (average risks of 8.7% and 7.3%, respectively).
  • Compared to masks, N95 respirators conferred superior protection against clinical respiratory illness and laboratory-confirmed bacterial, but not viral infections or influenza life illness (ILI).
  • Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias.
  • Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection was not statistically significant (compared to no mask)
• Randomized Controlled Trial: N95s vs medical masks in health care workers (HCWs) against influenza (2019).
  • https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
  • 2862 randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCW-seasons.
  • Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%) resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza. 90% said they wore the mask all the time.
• Review of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza (March 2020, China).
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12381
  • 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9,171 participants were included (2015-2020). There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks.
  • Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization.
• CDC Review since 1946 of masks and influenza (May 2020)
  • Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures.” https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
  • Systematic review. 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946–July 27, 2018.
  • There is limited evidence for face masks’ effectiveness in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure.
  • “Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission.”
• A study of 4 patients (July 2020, South Korea).
  • https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1342
  • Known patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 wore masks and coughed into a Petrie dish. “Both surgical and cotton masks seem to be ineffective in preventing the dissemination of SARS–CoV-2 from the coughs of patients with COVID-19 to the environment and external mask surface.”
• Studied different types of face coverings in non-clinical setting (August 2020).
  • https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/08/07/sciadv.abd3083
  • They used a black box, a laser, and a camera. A person wears a face mask and speaks into the direction of an expanded laser beam inside a dark enclosure. Droplets that propagate through the laser beam scatter light, which is recorded with a camera. A simple computer algorithm then counts the droplets seen in the video.
  • The N95 led to a droplet transmission of below 0.1%.
  • Cotton and polypropylene masks, some of which were made from apron material showed a droplet transmission ranging from 10% to 40%.
  • Knitted mask had up to 60% droplet transmission.
  • Neck fleece had 110% droplet transmission (10% higher than not wearing a mask).
  • Speaking through some masks (particularly the neck fleece, bandanas) seemed to disperse the largest droplets into a multitude of smaller droplets … which explains the apparent increase in droplet count relative to no mask in that case.

I had to take HCQ when I was in Mombassa, Kenya for prevention of malaria. It can treat other diseases. The locals have used it for years. Why has your communist MSNBC and CNN, Big Tech, and the rest of your communist media try to suppress it? What are you and your ilk trying to hide? Furthermore, constant wearing of a mask all day, will harbor germs and bacteria that can bring on other illnesses. The only mask that will work is the type they use in a virology lab, you moron. So, stop flaunting how much education you have. Apparently you have none, you clown.

COVID-19: To Mask or Not to Mask?

Never before’ has the leader of the free world been ‘so cognitively compromised’

https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6233603126001

https://libertyisftw.org/

Only they think it was justified to steal an election to “save us from Trump” . Sickening. https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

JUSTICE IS COMING

I was doing a deep dive on CDC web page. During the course of my research, I found this Excel sheet. Well look what we have here. So, if the virus originated in Wuhan, China in early 2020, like we were told by media, then why has the CDC been tracking it since January 14, 2017?

Exclusive: Over 432,000 Votes Removed From Trump in Pennsylvania: Data Scientists Say | Facts Matter|Embrace the suck Trump hater.

The little 5th grader at LIFTW https://libertyisftw.org/2020/11/10/54511/ thinks Trump was fired. Not so fast, little grasshopper.

Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell has uncovered a mass scale voter fraud from democrat pushed mail-in ballots AND voting machines. The CCP is using creepy pedo China sell-out Joe to steal the vote. Trump & Co knew this was coming. He has and exposed who they really are because legacy media is covering it up. You pushed on your 5th grade blog a false narrative “Russia Russia Russia” hoax for 4 years. Stand by for heavy rolls, little grasshopper blogger.

• 

HERE IS THE EVIDENCE UNDER “FILINGS AND EVIDENCE” AND “SCOTUS” LITTLE GRASSHOPPER, IF YOU ARE BRAVE ENOUGH. >>> https://www.sidneypowell.com/

ABSOLUTE PROOF – EMBRACE THE SUCK. JUSTICE IS COMING.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HbKBNjisZjyg/

There are 213,799,467 registered voters for 2020 WITH SOURCES here >> https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/number-of-registered-voters-by-state. Data can be downloaded into Excel.

Washington Post stated 66.2% of the 213,799,467 registered voted = 141,535,247 actually voted

>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/elections/voter-turnout/

So, if Trump won 74 mil votes (probably more, but we will go with your 74 mil) 141,535,247 actually voted – 74 mil = 67,535,247 for Biden.

Trump won by a landslide and you know it. Embrace the suck.                            

Recent development:

https://tennesseestar.com/2020/12/31/georgia-senate-hearing-on-election-integrity-concludes-with-order-for-fulton-county-to-turn-over-all-absentee-ballots-to-investigators/

Update: Embrace the suck, Trump haters. More witnesses testify. https://youtu.be/3RV57sFsojA

Update: Embrace the suck, Trump haters. Just a few of many >>> https://www.ntd.com/election-witnesses-speak

Update: Embrace the suck, Trump haters >>> EXCLUSIVE AUDIO: Democrat Whistleblower Exposes Biden Campaign Voter Fraud Operation

https://nationalfile.com/exclusive-audio-democrat-whistleblower-exposes-biden-campaign-voter-fraud-operation/

Update: Embrace the suck, Trump haters. >>> GA Senate Committee Releases Damning Report On Election Fraud – Election ‘Untrustworthy’…Recommends Decertifying Electors

https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/politics/2020/12/22/ga-senate-committee-releases-damning-report-on-election-fraud-election-untrustworty/

From Gateway Pundit below.

BOOM: President Trump Tweets that Dominion Attempted to Alter Our Election and Got Caught

https://www.sidneypowell.com/media/nancy-pelosis-chief-of-staff-is-chief-executive-and-feinsteins-husband-a-shareholder-at-dominion

I saw this article by Lynn H. Pryor: In a COVID-19 World, Is Our Hope Misplaced?  https://lynnhpryor.com/2020/05/25/in-a-covid-19-world-is-our-hope-misplaced/

We should not always blindly and always submit to government from a Biblical viewpoint. My argument is based on natural law that God Himself set into motion in the beginning. God created us as free moral agents. In Acts 5:29 – “But Peter and the apostles answered and said, We must obey God rather than men.” Yes, we obey man’s law until they violate God’s laws. Liberty is part of the natural human condition. God’s gives each of us gift(s) to use to benefit mankind. When government over steps these God ordained natural law boundaries, then, mankind should adhere to God’s established/Biblical law. Why did the Colonies rebel against the British Crown? Do you have any idea of how they treated the colonists? Why do you think the Pilgrims left Europe to come to the New World? Do you realized we blatantly rejected the British establish law in the colonies? We had a Revolutionary War over it. Was it right or wrong Biblically speaking for the colonies to rebel against man’s law? Had they not rebelled against the British Crown, there would not be a USA.

The egregious and tyrannical behavior of the governors to shut their economies, churches etc. down is unconstitutional and violating natural law established by God. Even if you don’t believe in the Judeo Christian God, you still enjoy the benefits of liberty.

They blatantly violate the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution which clearly states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

These governors also violate the 5th Amendment which states:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

These governors are taking away jobs and businesses which is by legal definition is private property over a virus without due process of law. They are blatantly abusing their power and the citizens just blindly follow like sheep to a slaughter. If you shut down the economy how do you think you can fight a virus? The economy has to keep moving to provide human capital and resources to fight the virus. People can’t provide for the families, lose their jobs. How many government workers lost their jobs? It’s moronic.

Furthermore, the US Constitution is not suspended during a “pandemic” The Founders knew about diseases. They knew and experienced diseases in the Colonies and NEVER suspended the rights of the people over it. If you did, you would not have the human capital and resources to fight a disease. Fauci and Birx led Trump wrong from the very beginning.  They kept changing the rules. The people are seeing this fraud perpetrated on them. Trump went along with it to a point. They are still wrong. The mortality rate is so small, approximately .0003% that is does not justify the actions of the state governors. Also, wearing a mask and “social distancing” is junk science because it suspends/blocks herd immunity. I never have and never will wear a mask. All this has proven that people are so easily manipulated by #fakenews. I was very suspicious of this from the beginning. I was proven right.